yass00_Au
Ross
G'day folks,
Just wanted to pick ya brains and hear your thoughts on who actually owns the river system? There seems to be conflicting reads over the WWW regarding this matter and some goes like this:
Old land titles state some boundaries go to the middle of the river, while I've read elsewhere the boundary should be fenced off 50 meters up from the banks?
If land is owned on both sides of the river then that section of river is private property and thus needing land owners permission?
The river is crown land and can be accessed while hiking or driving the river regardless of who owns the river either side but not enter the section of river through private property without permission?
I was driving around looking for access points to some particular sections of river but most where through private property with intimidating signage with no access points other than walking/hiking gear in along the river banks or driving along the river while water was low..
Cheers,
Ross
Just wanted to pick ya brains and hear your thoughts on who actually owns the river system? There seems to be conflicting reads over the WWW regarding this matter and some goes like this:
Old land titles state some boundaries go to the middle of the river, while I've read elsewhere the boundary should be fenced off 50 meters up from the banks?
If land is owned on both sides of the river then that section of river is private property and thus needing land owners permission?
The river is crown land and can be accessed while hiking or driving the river regardless of who owns the river either side but not enter the section of river through private property without permission?
I was driving around looking for access points to some particular sections of river but most where through private property with intimidating signage with no access points other than walking/hiking gear in along the river banks or driving along the river while water was low..
Cheers,
Ross