layful: 
layful: 
If you look at the date it is up to 12th December 2020 - i.e. yesterday when I posted it.Outback said:
goldierocks said:If you look at the date it is up to 12th December 2020 - i.e. yesterday when I posted it.Outback said:
My point was that gold has been seeing a good rise after a flat few years - I suspect it will continue asBidenJanet Yellen prints money.
grubstake said:goldierocks said:If you look at the date it is up to 12th December 2020 - i.e. yesterday when I posted it.Outback said:
My point was that gold has been seeing a good rise after a flat few years - I suspect it will continue asBidenJanet Yellen prints money.
Fixed that for you.
I suspect Biden will be a Reagan-type 'figurehead' president, where their appointees count for more than the nominal leader.
I don't think that applies to the timing of EVENTS and ACTIONS that affect the topic under discussion - I assume the rule was one against expressing political opinions (e.g. urging party political re voting). Otherwise it would follow if the unnamed premier of this unnamed state banned all gold detecting, we could not mention it? Expected actions that impact on gold price (e.g. printing money - an expected outcome of covid - or the date of confirmation of someone likely to do it - or whether it will be them or their Treasury Secretary) would surely be entirely relevant and not "political" per se. Quantitative easing is stated policy...jethro said:I thought discussing politics was not allowed. Look out or the fickle finger of fate will see you in the sin bin. :bomb:
layful: 
