Bjay. Accepted. SH has never posted his findings about the Impact,s good performance in goldfields with very high mineralisation.He tested one in a goldfield in 2016 but never mentioned its compatibility with very high mineralisation.Never did also Nasa Tom who tested it in his backyard in Florida.I was actually the first to do so last May,but got no response or interest here in Australia, USA and UK where I posted.So when I made a comment that there is a conspiracy against the Impact by the general prospecting community he took it personally as if I accused him and I was dumbfounded.I told him as soon as the Gold Monster 1000 came out there was lots of chatter on prospecting forums.Cant reason with the man. He also responded that 99% of Impact users bought it solely for hunting coins but the GM is a gold dedicated machine.That may be true but it so happens the Impact is very stable on our goldfields here in Victoria and he missed the point. Some Victorian buyers have also complained they wasted their money on the GM but that is beside the point and I don,t want to get embroiled in that. Personally I could not care less if people ignore the Impact.It works for me and that is all that counts.Like SH I am only interested in comparing, finding information and discussing with other users all about VLF,s on goldfields. I was brought up with VLF,s 40 years ago and its hard to let go although there are better more expensive machines out there. Unfortunately I can,t put in all the hours needed to find gold due to my painful knee and back but I am trying and long after others have retired from prospecting and live in nursing homes.