They've confirmed what some people have been saying or been aware of for years. These departments do monitor social media. Can't say we haven't been warned. :|In a statement, Queensland's Department of Environment and Science confirmed they were investigating an offence in relation to "interference with natural resources" and could not comment further as the investigation was ongoing.
It said rangers monitored social media accounts to identify and investigate alleged "noncompliant activities."
Which is a good thingRedfin said:Loose lips sink ships.
You might doubt it but they do it using various means including Media Monitoring Services like Meltwater, BuzzNumbers, Cubit or even the CSIRO's own Vizie monitoring software.goldierocks said:"These departments do monitor social media". I doubt that.
mbasko said:You might doubt it but they do it using various means including Media Monitoring Services like Meltwater, BuzzNumbers, Cubit or even the CSIRO's own Vizie monitoring software.goldierocks said:"These departments do monitor social media". I doubt that.
These types of companies/platform can track online conversations across social media, blogs, forums, news, video, Q&A, Wiki's & pretty much everywhere online. They don't require huge human resources out of Government Departments & lucky for us we (taxpayers) pay for it.
The NSW Government Media Monitoring Services contract stipulates social media monitoring as a key function.
I do agree with Heatho & yourself that in the above one off case it would be unlikely that it was captured by those means. Somebody likely reported him through a dislike for him or ultra green not liking the disturbance of a rock. Either way it was followed up (even if it does appear erroneously).
However I do believe that where non-compliant activities are regularly discovered or reported & involve specific forums, websites, Farcebook Groups, other interest groups, individuals then they are well & truly open to being monitored either by the indirect means above or directly by relevant Government Departments.
Gentlemen, we can rebuild him. We have the technology.
Yes, that is more my point - one can easily link and monitor things, but humans still have to decide what is relevant. For example, narrowing using a search on "gold" might produce a manageable list (although it would require a department of people to monitor the hits just on this site). And a couple of rangers following tyre tracks would probably be more productive. However I doubt that they would even try "quartz" as a key word...... No, in this case someone has dobbed him in.mbasko said:You might doubt it but they do it using various means including Media Monitoring Services like Meltwater, BuzzNumbers, Cubit or even the CSIRO's own Vizie monitoring software.goldierocks said:"These departments do monitor social media". I doubt that.
These types of companies/platform can track online conversations across social media, blogs, forums, news, video, Q&A, Wiki's & pretty much everywhere online. They don't require huge human resources out of Government Departments & lucky for us we (taxpayers) pay for it.
The NSW Government Media Monitoring Services contract stipulates social media monitoring as a key function.
I do agree with Heatho & yourself that in the above one off case it would be unlikely that it was captured by those means. Somebody likely reported him through a dislike for him or ultra green not liking the disturbance of a rock. Either way it was followed up (even if it does appear erroneously).
However I do believe that where non-compliant activities are regularly discovered or reported & involve specific forums, websites, Farcebook Groups, other interest groups, individuals then they are well & truly open to being monitored either by the indirect means above or directly by relevant Government Departments.
Enter your email address to join: