Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
QED
QED vs SDC Comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mbasko" data-source="post: 569087" data-attributes="member: 4485"><p>Never ran a Sadie on the QED but have seen good reports. Hopefully someone whose run both can answer you.</p><p>The 8" Commander was good but I found that the 11" Detech Ultra mono (spiral like Evo's & Elites) was pretty close in sensitivity but better on depth so preferred to use it mostly as I was really after better depth vs small gold sensitivity. As said the 8" Commander ran well & was better around rocky/overgrown areas (the Sadie would be better again in that regard).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mbasko, post: 569087, member: 4485"] Never ran a Sadie on the QED but have seen good reports. Hopefully someone whose run both can answer you. The 8" Commander was good but I found that the 11" Detech Ultra mono (spiral like Evo's & Elites) was pretty close in sensitivity but better on depth so preferred to use it mostly as I was really after better depth vs small gold sensitivity. As said the 8" Commander ran well & was better around rocky/overgrown areas (the Sadie would be better again in that regard). [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
QED
QED vs SDC Comparison
Top