Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
QED
QED vs SDC Comparison
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rush" data-source="post: 373514" data-attributes="member: 5224"><p>Thanks Tathradj for opening up this thread.</p><p></p><p>As a QED owner it would be interesting how both detectors compare to one another.</p><p>For a fair comparison the QED would need to have an 8" mono attached.</p><p>Unfortunately I have no one with an SDC2300 to compare my QED too.</p><p></p><p>It appears the SDC is a simpler detector to master and only needs a quick GB and off you go.</p><p>The QED is somewhat more involved although the AGB is an aid towards a quicker GB. </p><p>Also once the QED is set those settings are saved when you switch off.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rush, post: 373514, member: 5224"] Thanks Tathradj for opening up this thread. As a QED owner it would be interesting how both detectors compare to one another. For a fair comparison the QED would need to have an 8" mono attached. Unfortunately I have no one with an SDC2300 to compare my QED too. It appears the SDC is a simpler detector to master and only needs a quick GB and off you go. The QED is somewhat more involved although the AGB is an aid towards a quicker GB. Also once the QED is set those settings are saved when you switch off. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
QED
QED vs SDC Comparison
Top