Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
General Metal Detector Discussion
Garrett AT Gold vs. MineLabs Eureka Gold
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GOLD Billyen" data-source="post: 63643" data-attributes="member: 2559"><p>(I always try to do a solid search of the forums and the net before I make a new thread but, I was surprised to find very little on this comparison.)</p><p>I'm going to buy a detector soon and I'll buy a cheap $100 unit but, then I'd like to buy a top of the line VLF. Then buy a PI.</p><p></p><p>Now I'm a newbie and some of you will cringe with these points but, I'm thinking these are the top VLF from 2 of the best brands. So that's something. </p><p>The price is about the same but, I'm seeing some cheaper used AT Golds. Now the 2 things bugging me are this. I think the Eureka Gold "may" be the better machine for finding gold. However, I have to admit the LCD display on the AT is cool (for a newbie) . I also like the waterproofness of the AT. I think I'll be doing some detecting in areas where it will be wet and I like the idea if putting the detector underwater. </p><p></p><p>The Eureka does have the 60kHz where the AT only goes to 18. </p><p></p><p>What do you guys think?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GOLD Billyen, post: 63643, member: 2559"] (I always try to do a solid search of the forums and the net before I make a new thread but, I was surprised to find very little on this comparison.) I'm going to buy a detector soon and I'll buy a cheap $100 unit but, then I'd like to buy a top of the line VLF. Then buy a PI. Now I'm a newbie and some of you will cringe with these points but, I'm thinking these are the top VLF from 2 of the best brands. So that's something. The price is about the same but, I'm seeing some cheaper used AT Golds. Now the 2 things bugging me are this. I think the Eureka Gold "may" be the better machine for finding gold. However, I have to admit the LCD display on the AT is cool (for a newbie) . I also like the waterproofness of the AT. I think I'll be doing some detecting in areas where it will be wet and I like the idea if putting the detector underwater. The Eureka does have the 60kHz where the AT only goes to 18. What do you guys think? [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
General Metal Detector Discussion
Garrett AT Gold vs. MineLabs Eureka Gold
Top