Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
General
General Chat
Whinge of the day thread...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nightjar" data-source="post: 662069" data-attributes="member: 1414"><p>MB, Lang Hancock involved in that decision that would have benefitted both the coal and iron ore companies and Australia as a whole? Adding to this moving cattle, tropical fruit, the list is endless.</p><p>And the taxpayer wouldn't have to cough up for the whole project. </p><p>And, the wharfies wouldn't have been waving their banners for their cut. </p><p><a href="https://economics.org.au/2011/02/lang-hancocks-pilbara-queensland-railway-proposal/" target="_blank">https://economics.org.au/2011/02/lang-hancocks-pilbara-queensland-railway-proposal/</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nightjar, post: 662069, member: 1414"] MB, Lang Hancock involved in that decision that would have benefitted both the coal and iron ore companies and Australia as a whole? Adding to this moving cattle, tropical fruit, the list is endless. And the taxpayer wouldn't have to cough up for the whole project. And, the wharfies wouldn't have been waving their banners for their cut. [URL]https://economics.org.au/2011/02/lang-hancocks-pilbara-queensland-railway-proposal/[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
General
General Chat
Whinge of the day thread...
Top