Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Rules & Regulations
Victorian Government Response to Victorian Environmental Assessment Councils (VEAC) Investigation into additional prospecting areas in parks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MegsyB007" data-source="post: 453461" data-attributes="member: 13534"><p>What a load of biased rubbish! "More than 60" supporters get a big photo with the obviously placed kid in the foreground (what, couldn't count all the way up to 70?), and the "Hundreds" of campaigners against it, get the little pic showing all of 7 people clearly in it! This is biased reporting at it's worst! How many "hundreds" was it exactly? Two, six, nine hundred? Care to be just a bit more exact, Angela Crawford?! While the "More than 60" and "ecologist" Charles Meredith from VEAC get most of the story to put forward their say, and the hundreds 'against' get two sentences in it! (And doesn't an Ecologist have an actual degree, so shouldn't it be spelt with a capital E? Does he even have a degree?). And that's just the start of the bad reporting! </p><p></p><p>Didn't anyone tell you that reporters were meant to be impartial, Angela Crawford?!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MegsyB007, post: 453461, member: 13534"] What a load of biased rubbish! "More than 60" supporters get a big photo with the obviously placed kid in the foreground (what, couldn't count all the way up to 70?), and the "Hundreds" of campaigners against it, get the little pic showing all of 7 people clearly in it! This is biased reporting at it's worst! How many "hundreds" was it exactly? Two, six, nine hundred? Care to be just a bit more exact, Angela Crawford?! While the "More than 60" and "ecologist" Charles Meredith from VEAC get most of the story to put forward their say, and the hundreds 'against' get two sentences in it! (And doesn't an Ecologist have an actual degree, so shouldn't it be spelt with a capital E? Does he even have a degree?). And that's just the start of the bad reporting! Didn't anyone tell you that reporters were meant to be impartial, Angela Crawford?! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Rules & Regulations
Victorian Government Response to Victorian Environmental Assessment Councils (VEAC) Investigation into additional prospecting areas in parks
Top