Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Rules & Regulations
Victorian Government Response to Victorian Environmental Assessment Councils (VEAC) Investigation into additional prospecting areas in parks
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HeadsUp" data-source="post: 442068" data-attributes="member: 414"><p>Does anyone here have the knowledge and ability to research the following ;</p><p></p><p>Regarding the intention of VEAC , or the people pulling their strings , is it possible that their true intentions are to "create" national parks which they can use to claim carbon credits for , or claim it for credits to comply with the Kyoto protocols and obtain environmental accreditation without actually doing anything tangible to improve the environment ?</p><p></p><p>There are real things which can reduce CO2 and other pollutants such as cutting back on coal fired power stations , improving vehicle emissions standards , reducing industrial pollutants through technological innovations etc.</p><p></p><p>Is environmental accreditation the true nature of the conspiracy here ?</p><p></p><p>If so , someone needs to get a quiet tap on the shoulder and answer some questions about integrity.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HeadsUp, post: 442068, member: 414"] Does anyone here have the knowledge and ability to research the following ; Regarding the intention of VEAC , or the people pulling their strings , is it possible that their true intentions are to "create" national parks which they can use to claim carbon credits for , or claim it for credits to comply with the Kyoto protocols and obtain environmental accreditation without actually doing anything tangible to improve the environment ? There are real things which can reduce CO2 and other pollutants such as cutting back on coal fired power stations , improving vehicle emissions standards , reducing industrial pollutants through technological innovations etc. Is environmental accreditation the true nature of the conspiracy here ? If so , someone needs to get a quiet tap on the shoulder and answer some questions about integrity. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Gold Prospecting
Prospecting Rules & Regulations
Victorian Government Response to Victorian Environmental Assessment Councils (VEAC) Investigation into additional prospecting areas in parks
Top