Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
Minelab
minelab SE Pro vs E-trac
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ben78" data-source="post: 145204" data-attributes="member: 206"><p>THey are different, whilst the Etrac is newer the iron and ground nulling software is different. Minelab actually went back to the Explorer software for nulling in the 3030 as it was better. Etrac has more precise Conductivity ID, but on the other hand the Fe ID is more precise on the explorer (Etrac tends towards '12' for all 'good' targets whereas Explorer used the full range 0-32)</p><p></p><p>If I was buying a FBS detector today it would either be a Explorer or a 3030. But, YMMV.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ben78, post: 145204, member: 206"] THey are different, whilst the Etrac is newer the iron and ground nulling software is different. Minelab actually went back to the Explorer software for nulling in the 3030 as it was better. Etrac has more precise Conductivity ID, but on the other hand the Fe ID is more precise on the explorer (Etrac tends towards '12' for all 'good' targets whereas Explorer used the full range 0-32) If I was buying a FBS detector today it would either be a Explorer or a 3030. But, YMMV. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
Minelab
minelab SE Pro vs E-trac
Top