Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
Minelab
GPX6000 Versus GPZ7000
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GemQ" data-source="post: 626232" data-attributes="member: 11694"><p>Hi all,</p><p></p><p>I expected that there might be a fair difference between the detectors given the depth of the targets at the test patch. But the 6000 did a really good job - better than the Zed in Hi Yield, Zed just ahead in General (shown in video) and expected that the Zed did very well in Deep. Given most run the Zed in High Yield or General the 6000 did well.</p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]2vPMWHoNc70[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GemQ, post: 626232, member: 11694"] Hi all, I expected that there might be a fair difference between the detectors given the depth of the targets at the test patch. But the 6000 did a really good job - better than the Zed in Hi Yield, Zed just ahead in General (shown in video) and expected that the Zed did very well in Deep. Given most run the Zed in High Yield or General the 6000 did well. [MEDIA=youtube]2vPMWHoNc70[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
Minelab
GPX6000 Versus GPZ7000
Top