Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Charts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Metal Detectors
General Metal Detector Discussion
Garrett ATX vs Minelab GPX5000
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support Prospecting Australia:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zakman" data-source="post: 38133" data-attributes="member: 1440"><p>This are all great points thanks guys.</p><p>Garret advertised that the ATX was tested in WA which </p><p>the advertising utube does indicate but it's just quick screen shoots.</p><p>I would have thought that Garret would have highlight finding deep fine gold if they actually found any.</p><p>GPx is renown for its deepth on fine gold and that's what we all need more deepth on fine gold if the ATX doesn't have the deepth at least to equal the GPX 5000 I would be surprised.</p><p></p><p>All the information and instructional on utube are with "motion on" mode everyone says that the motion off setting is for advanced users and will give more deepth so hopefully as soon as we get some advanced users information, the truth will be known.</p><p></p><p>If Garret's performance was as good or better then they would have used this in the promotion by simply showing deep discoverys.</p><p> </p><p>So I have my doubts that the ATX has the deepth but it does appear they have the ground balance and tracking pretty well set.</p><p></p><p>Only time will tell.</p><p></p><p>Thanks for the chat guys.</p><p>Regards Zakman</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zakman, post: 38133, member: 1440"] This are all great points thanks guys. Garret advertised that the ATX was tested in WA which the advertising utube does indicate but it's just quick screen shoots. I would have thought that Garret would have highlight finding deep fine gold if they actually found any. GPx is renown for its deepth on fine gold and that's what we all need more deepth on fine gold if the ATX doesn't have the deepth at least to equal the GPX 5000 I would be surprised. All the information and instructional on utube are with "motion on" mode everyone says that the motion off setting is for advanced users and will give more deepth so hopefully as soon as we get some advanced users information, the truth will be known. If Garret's performance was as good or better then they would have used this in the promotion by simply showing deep discoverys. So I have my doubts that the ATX has the deepth but it does appear they have the ground balance and tracking pretty well set. Only time will tell. Thanks for the chat guys. Regards Zakman [/QUOTE]
Verification
Post reply
Metal Detectors
General Metal Detector Discussion
Garrett ATX vs Minelab GPX5000
Top